Hues of Education

College classrooms often bear the reputation of being dull and uninspiring. Most of the time, classrooms are just rows and rows of tables, black or gray chairs used for seats, and mono-colored walls. These types of classroom environments contribute to a sense of monotony which doesn’t foster an optimal learning environment. The lack of visual stimulation can lead for students to disengage and reduce attention spans to their professors and further lead to low test averages and low academic performance in class. As classrooms are a vital part of our learning environment and the way that students engage in lectures, the classroom environment that we are in should be more engaging and vibrant and create a more stimulating atmosphere. 

When it comes to learning, there are various factors that influence how we absorb and retain information. One factor that influences our learning experience and is often overlooked is the impact of colors. Colors impact the way that information is processed in our brain, so when placed in an environment that is not monotonous, the brain reacts to the colors that are in the room. For example, warmer and more vibrant colors, such as red and yellow are known to be stimulating to the brain.  When we see the color red, our bodies react naturally releasing adrenaline in the brain. The adrenaline increases our blood pressure and heart rate as well, this heightened state can lead to enhanced focus and attention. It can increase quick responses to reactions and physical performances in classes. Due to the adrenaline, it creates a more collaborative space as well, as students are able to communicate and discuss more freely about the content at hand. Vibrant classroom colors such as red and yellow are attention grabbers as well, so when placed in an environment that is not so visually stimulating, it is easier for students to understand the material as it is being taught in front of them. 

The other end of the color spectrum is colors that have cooler tones creating a calming and soothing effect for the mind. These colors reduce stress and anxiety within students creating a safe space for them to learn. Cooler hues such as blue and green are known to be psychologically and physiologically influencing. When seeing shades of blue and green, it creates a sense of tranquility and stability with the mind. This sense of calmness helps students memorize and understand material more than in a white-and-gray classroom environment. Physiologically, cooler colors reduce cortisol levels and increase the production of serotonin which calms the mind down even further and creates a sense of security. Cooler colors should be placed in classrooms where students need to have a lot of focus and concentration. Study halls, testing centers, and tutoring areas are also places where students benefit from having cooler tones of colors in their classroom walls and decorations. 

Straying away from the monotonous walls and classroom decorations helps students excel better in the natural learning environment. Having different shades of colors for classroom walls unexpectedly serves as an intrinsic motivator to students. Brighter and more visually appealing colors stimulate classroom environments and change students’ attitude and make them more motivated to learn. These colors promote a sense of enthusiasm that further builds collaboration between students. Cooler colors create a sense of stability and calmness in the student’s mind. Blue and green incorporated into the classroom settings, helps students understand course material faster and in a calm and effective manner. 

By effectively using the power of colors, it can lead to better learning outcomes in the classroom and a better understanding of harder and more challenging materials. Colors and hues play a pivotal role in enhancing cognitive processes in learning environments. They shape students’ educational experiences to be better and provide them with an extra push that enables them to be better in their classes. Whenever there is a classroom that needs renovating or a school being built, educators, teachers, and students alike should pay a little more attention to the colors of their classrooms. The slight change in detail can foster a whole different learning environment that is beneficial to all. 

References:

AL‐Ayash, A., Kane, R. T., Smith, D., & Green‐Armytage, P. (2016). The influence of color on student emotion, heart rate, and performance in learning environments. Color Research & Application, 41(2), 196-205.

Mehta, R., & Zhu, R. (2009). Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science, 323(5918), 1226-1229.

Ray, B. (2022, August 1). Best colors for classroom and the psychology behind it. A Tutor. https://atutor.ca/best-colors-for-classroom/ 

Yildirim, K., Cagatay, K., & Ayalp, N. (2015). Effect of wall color on the perception of classrooms. Indoor and Built Environment, 24(5), 607-616.

Your journey starts here! Let’s talk!

ThemeRex © 2026. All rights reserved.
  Timothy Durham was convicted of rape when a test showed his DNA genotype matched the DNA recovered from the crime scene. Eye witnesses testified that Durham was in a different state at the time of the incident, but he wasn’t exonerated from his 3000 year sentence until follow up DNA analysis showed that the preliminary forensic analysis used in the trial was misinterpreted (Thomas et al.). DNA testing serves an invaluable part in our criminal justice system, but it comes with complications and bias that can lead to wrongful convictions and misinformed juries.  

Background:

Forensic genetics aims to identify the origin of a biological sample. It can be traced back to Karl Landsteiner who discovered human ABO blood groups. With blood groups, suspects could be eliminated based on their blood type. For example, if a suspect had type A blood and there was type B blood left at the scene by the perpetrator, the investigators could rule out the suspect. Unfortunately, the reverse didn’t work. If the suspect and perpetrator both had the same blood type, it can’t be concluded that the suspect was guilty. Blood identifiers evolved into 8 distinct categories which improved the ability to eliminate suspects, but could only conclude that (if the system matched) it might be the perpetrator or this person might be related to the perpetrator (Jobling and Gill). The field evolved in the 1980s with the discovery of Minisatellites, lines of repetitive DNA that don’t encode proteins. Minisatellite patterns in DNA create what we know today as the DNA fingerprint, and it has a much higher accuracy rate than previous methods (Augustyn et al.). Around the same time, a breakthrough for victims of sexual assault was discovered. In the case of assault, bodily fluids of both the victim and the assaulter can get mixed. A process called differential lysis was created which could selectively increase the concentration of sperm in a fluid sample thereby allowing for accurate DNA testing (Jobling and Gill). Forensics evolved to use single-locus probe testing after several years because of its ease of interpretation. It looked at specific minisatellites that had high variability between subjects. This was the first DNA-based method to be used in a criminal investigation. Two murder homicides from several years apart were connected using DNA evidence. The evidence was then used to exonerate an innocent man, and the guilty party was found when he tried to evade mandatory DNA testing for all men in the small town. His guilt was then reinforced when the DNA profiles matched, and he gave a confession (Jobling and Gill). Finding DNA at a crime scene doesn’t guarantee that you’ll find a murderer. There are issues with non-pure samples and limited samples that make DNA work difficult, and accreditation of facilities and new techniques and take time (Jobling and Gill).  

Subjectivity of DNA Interpretation:

In a 2009 publication, the National Academy of Science discusses the possibility for subjective influence in lab based forensics. The interpretation bias happens in complex cases where, for example, there could be a mixture of DNA. A study published in 2011 looked specifically at this issue. A gang rape happened in Georgia, and the mixture in DNA from the case was used to prosecute one suspect after another suspect took a plea bargain to testify against him. With DNA mixtures, there are three possible conclusions: suspect excluded, suspect cannot be excluded, and inconclusive. If the suspect is excluded, it means that there’s little to no possibility that his DNA is part of the sample. If the suspect cannot be excluded, it means that there’s a possibility that his DNA is part of the sample. In the trial, the DNA examiners who knew the context of the case concluded that the suspect being prosecuted could not be excluded. The 2011 study gave the DNA evidence from this case and the DNA profiles of the suspects to 17 forensic examiners. These examiners had no context of the case, and they all worked independently. Of the 17, only 1 came to the same conclusion (suspect cannot be excluded) as the examiners who knew the context of the case. Twelve of the 17 concluded that the suspect who was prosecuted and convicted had no relation to the DNA found in the sample. Not only does this show that subjectivity occurs due to the context of the case, but the 17 examiners came up with different findings based on their past experiences meaning that not all DNA analysis is objective. Some organizations like the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods say that quantitative statistical evidence should be presented with every categorical conclusion, but the US doesn’t require this (Dror and Hampikian).

False Positives:

There are two categories that cause wrongful identification in a DNA report: coincidental matches and false positives. Coincidental matches are DNA matches between two unrelated people. The probability of these matches is about 1 to 500,000 for white individuals and about 1 to 350,000 for black individuals. This small probability of coincidental matches makes people feel confident in DNA evidence. False positives, on the other hand, are matches between DNA and test DNA that result from issues in the forensics lab. There have been multiple cases of forensics labs accidentally switching victim and suspected rapist DNA which lead to convictions that were later overturned when the lab realized the error. There are also cases of misreading or misunderstanding a sample. In a case from 1993, a man was convicted of rape because someone interpreted a mixed sample of victim and perpetrator DNA as an individual sample. The conviction was again overturned. To prevent false convictions, retesting DNA is allowed, but it’s not an efficient solution. Many people are pushing for statistical information on the probability of false positives, so that the jurors can make accurate judgements based on DNA evidence (Thomas et al.).  

Conclusion:

DNA analysis is a useful tool for the criminal justice system, but subjectivity can be an issue in forensic testing. To combat wrongful convictions, there are organizations like The Innocence Project who use DNA testing to free the innocent, but reformed forensic testing standards should be put in place to prevent subjectivity and to ensure juries are correctly informed during trials. https://www.innocenceproject.org/    

Citation:

Augustyn , Adam, et al. “DNA Finerprinting.” Encyclopedia Britannica , 26 Apr. 2018, www.britannica.com/science/DNA-fingerprinting#ref153186. Dror, Itiel E., and Greg Hampikian. “Subjectivity and Bias in Forensic DNA Mixture Interpretation.” Science & Justice, vol. 51, no. 4, 2011, pp. 204–208., doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004. Jobling, Mark A., and Peter Gill. “Encoded Evidence: DNA in Forensic Analysis.” Nature Reviews: Genetics, vol. 5, no. 10, Oct. 2004, pp. 739–751., doi:10.1038/nrg1455. Thompson, William C, et al. “How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence.” Journal of Forensic Sciences, vol. 48, no. 1, Jan. 2003, pp. 1–8., doi:10.1520/jfs2001171.